<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Tzafrir Cohen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tzafrir@cohens.org.il">tzafrir@cohens.org.il</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 02:23:46PM +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote:<br>
> What do you guys think about this issue? I want to say that it's pressing,<br>
> but:<br>
><br>
> 1. This is the only remaining problematic protocol for me. SSH works<br>
> perfectly, and git works just as well over HTTP nowadays, if I'm not<br>
> mistaken.<br>
> 2. It seems unnecessary, in my opinion, for this protocol to exist - it<br>
> should just be done over HTTP.<br>
<br>
</div>Surely not. A different protocol makes it easy for the provider to treat<br>
this protocol differently.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>All the more reason to do it over HT... oh, I see what you did there.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Man is the only animal that laughs and weeps, for he is the only animal that is struck with the difference between what things are and what they ought to be.<br>
- William Hazlitt<br><br>Ohad Lutzky<br>
</div>